Risk and exam
Shareable reference
Which decisions stay human-owned, what meaningful review looks like, kill-switch owner, and revalidation when the vendor changes the model.
Share: https://meridian.keyteller.com/use-cases/board-risk-appetite-for-autonomy
A practical example
Ops wants a workflow that drafts, files, or books with light review. The risk committee needs a written appetite: which decisions stay human-owned, what meaningful review looks like in a sample of 50 cases, override rates, kill-switch owner, and revalidation triggers when the vendor changes the model. Rubber-stamp review is not oversight. Examiners reconstruct cases.
What you leave with. A voted appetite statement and the operating bounds that follow.
Not this. A one-line human-in-the-loop policy or an ethics poster. Calendar for this class of work is measured in weeks, not hours.
Related situations